![]() |
Introduction: |
Origins and Precursors
The Romance: The usual European term is roman, reflecting the origin of the form in the medieval
romance. Originally, romanice simply meant "in the Roman language." In Old French,
the word roman described profane fictions about Arthur, Charlemagne, the knights of
their courts, and classical heroes. Originally in verse, these elegant, highly conventional
tales of chivalric adventure, celebrated courtly love in the framework of a knight's quest
for his lady's favour (modern "romance novels" are similarly conventional and indeed
have similar themes). The romances emerged in the 11th and 12th centuries, soon
spreading from France to other parts of Europe and to England, where the Arthurian
Romances became enduring works in verse and prose.
The Novella: The English term novel is derived from the Italian novella, literally meaning "a little new thing"; the term was used to describe brief prose tales, often quite scandalous.
Boccaccio's Decameron (c. 1351) is the most famous collection of such tales. The 100
tales are linked by a loose narrative frame: ten handsome young nobles flee the plague in
Florence and spend ten days entertaining one another with story-telling. Each person tells
one tale each day, and each day has a set theme. The tales were brief, and most of the
interest derived from the plot. Few bothered with character development.
The Picaresque Narrative: The name of the "picaresque narrative" derives from the Spanish picaro, rogue. The form emerged in the 16th century and became popular internationally in the 17th and 18th
centuries. The anonymous narrative Lazarillo de Tormes was the first recognizable
picaresque novel, although the basic model was established in classical literature:
Apuleius' The Golden Ass is generally considered a precursor of the later form. The most
famous quasi-picaresque narrative is Cervantes' Don Quixote of 1605. Picaresque
narratives are scurrilous, highly episodic, but linked by common characters. Modern
counterparts include episodic tales of skullduggery and low-living such as Moll Flanders
and Huckleberry Finn.
Histories: In the seventeenth century the word "novel" was frequently applied to romances of illicit
love--one of the most original of which was written by a woman playwright and poet, Aphra
Behn: Oroonoko, or the History of a Royal Slave (1688). Against the background of a real
setting--that is to say, one involving the true names of persons and places--it told a tale of heroic
love. It was pure Restoration drama, in fact, and it was indeed eventually adapted for the stage.
The subtitle "History" is interesting. In its early form, the novel usually made no claims to being
an art form. Benn states in the introductory lines of her story that she witnessed many of the
chief scenes she described. This was no more than history in the older sense of the word. The
boundary between fact and fiction tends to become more and more blurred as we travel backward
in time. The traditional idea of writing history was that the events were true, but the descriptions,
dialogue, and various minor details were invented. This is somewhat like the modern school of
journalism which claims to change only the names, dates, settings, and details of conversations
(to protect the innocent sources): everything else is true. Behn's claim was taken seriously--so
seriously that it has been assumed, for more than two hundred years, that she lived for a time in
the West Indian setting of the novel. She did not, of course.
The fictional history is best exemplified by the writing of Daniel Defoe, which generally dealt
with familiar types of people in exotic but believable situations. The most popular of his
works today is probably Robinson Crusoe, but he wrote an enormous number of other works of a
similar character, including Moll Flanders, A Journal of the Plague Year. All of these works skillfully mixed truth and invention.
Other Forms: The Epistolary Novel: Defoe's "histories" were followed by a new form popularized by Samuel Richardson.
Richardson took a technique established at least a century before and successfully applied it to
the novel: he presented the entire story as a series of letters exchanged between the principal
characters and their friends. Such a work, which we usually call an epistolary novel makes, like
Defoe's confessions, great claims to authenticity. The documents are presented to the readers,
and it is up to them to create the story for themselves. As you might imagine, the form had its
limitations. The writer was forced to include, because of the demands of the form of a letter, a
great deal of repetitive and useless information. Nevertheless, it was immensely popular form,
and it remains popular.
More congenial and familiar is the work of Henry Fielding; however, even his novels
offer modern readers some difficulties. The novel was still largely a package deal in Fielding's
time--a combination of a variety of literary forms held loosely together by a plot line. Tom
Jones, Fielding's most famous novel, was filled with elements of sermons, travelogues, as well as
personal essays on a variety of topics, most largely irrelevant to the plot. It was not until the late
eighteenth and the nineteenth century that the more stream-lined modern novel emerged--in the
works of Jane Austen, Sir Walter Scott, Charles Dickens, William Thackeray, and eventually
George Eliot and Thomas Hardy. In the following century, the present one that is drawing to a
close, there has been an explosion of novel writing, and increased experiment with the form of
the novel.
Finally, in the 18th century, the novel, emerged beginning, perhaps, with Daniel Defoe's
1719 Robinson Crusoe and 1722 Moll Flanders--both clearly developed from the
picaresque narrative, and both episodic, colourful, and scandalous. Both are more
strongly unified than earlier narratives, the one by setting and situation, the other by
character. Interestingly, the term "novel" was initially avoided. Association with novelle
had led to the term being used in the 17th century to describe romances sexual liasons.
Defoe and others preferred the term "history"; indeed, early novelists were often careful
to provide explanations for the existence of their texts, presenting them as journals,
memoirs, or exchanges of letters.
General Qualities of the Novel:
It is difficult to define a novel or even to identify the qualitative differences between the novel and the short story; however,
the length of the novel does affect the nature of the word in remarkable ways. Consider this: if short stories dealt with the basic situations of life, and there were only three of these, you could only write three short stories offering unique plots.
The modern novel appeared only after centuries of vigorous experiment. The novel developed slowly in the 17th and 18th centuries, gradually taking shape as writers drew on various literary traditions and responded to several crucial social and intellectual influences. Although many critics consider the modern novel to have emerged in England, the three chief fictional precursors of the novel were French (the romance), Italian (the novella), and Spanish (the picaresque narrative). Behind these relatively modern genres lay the great tradition of the epic, the vast, compendious form which presented a people's most deeply-rooted values to itself--a task which the novel eventually claimed for itself. Still another tradition upon which novelists drew (and still draw) is that of the history: the factual account of real events.
A novel, being a compound form, would allow you to create a greater variety: you could, by using two of these incidents in succession,
write six different novels merely by varying the order in which they occur. Using three essential plots increases the number of original configurations to sixty-three.
Also, the reading experience is vastly different. At the end of reading a short story, a reader has the whole story in mind. Because a novel is longer, the reader's mind only holds a limited portion of the whole at one time. What we retain and what we forget, if only temporary, is of vital interest to the novelist.
Every novelist gives us a personal, idiosyncratic vision of the world. The vision is acted out by images of men and women. It is, so to speak, populated by these characters; critics frequently and with justice talk of a novelist's "world." This is the measure of a novelist, in one view. "Genius is the ability to put into effect what is in your mind. There's no other definition of it." Fitzgerald himself made that statement. He found that the greatest challenge of writing lay in trying to create this imaginative realm on paper--to make his fictitious world a self-contained entity consistent in itself. To some extent these worlds tend to conform to the psychological laws which govern its readers--otherwise we would be lost, wandering in an insane world--and this is one tendency of modern writing: experimentation with probability, motivation, and the essence of the fictional situation itself. In most cases, of course, the novel conforms, at least, to the psychological laws which govern its creator and his response to life. Which is to say that the reader and writer will always have some common ground, but that the writer will deliberately manipulate the reader's recognition of aspects of the real world in the fictional world.
These qualities make it a natural replacement for the epic, the ancient oral and, later, literary
form which conveyed communal ideals and experience of the world to successive generations.
Function of Epic
Reasons for the emergence of the novel
One important development was the emergence of a reading public--a class of people with the time, the education, and the money to create a demand for popular literature. This was something of a new development in the 17th century. A great mass
of people with shared interests and with enough money to pursue these interests began to form.
Their interests were not as specialized as those of the smaller educated elite they supplemented.
They were not classicists, interested in the revival of ancient learning; they were not scientists
absorbed in the latest experiments and theories. They were townspeople, involved and interested
in the lives of people like themselves, and, by contrast, in the entertainment afforded by exotic
adventures.
As well as economic and changes there were changes in attitudes. In the seventeenth century, religious turmoil had savaged the country and had brought about a civil war over the succession. Passionate religious feeling gradually abated as the century drew to a close, and a new interest in politics, in the formation of society, and in life considered as the subject of serious study began to supplant it. People became interested in seeing aspects of their lives portrayed and discussed. The effect of this new focus was first seen in the development of a new type of drama (domestic drama, both tragic and comic) and in the increasing popularity of the personal essay, both of which forms were inherited in a considerably developed state from the previous century; however, neither form was sufficient to satisfy the demand or exhaust the market for this literature of middle-class life. The taste for accounts of human experience became more wide-spread. New forms of narrative were developed. A new type of journalism emerged, producing a variety of new works.
Finally, there was the continuing and explosive growth of cheap mechanical printing technology which made it possible to sell long
narratives to a large public.
Results
Early History of the Novel (After Defoe)